Our news on intellectual property

No use, loss of exclusivity

In a decision of October 21, 2019 (TAF B-6505/2017), the Swiss Federal Administrative Court confirmed the dismissal of the opposition filed by Puma against a third party’s trademark containing the word element PUMA. The conflicting trademark covers waters, fruit juices, non-alcoholic and alcoholic beverages. The plaintiff did not manage to show sufficient use of their trademark in relation to the stated goods for a 5-year period preceding the non-use counterclaim raised by the other side. It is interesting to note that Puma’s trademark designates not less than 42 classes of goods and services. It is interesting to note that Puma’s trademark designates not less than 42 classes of goods and services. A targeted protection is sometimes a better choice to ensure exclusivity at lower cost.

For your success

Based in Geneva, SEDIN assists you in protecting, enhancing and defending your trademarks and intellectual property assets in Switzerland and internationally.

Other news

3 September 2021

Baselworld – 2021 Geneva Watch Days

31 August 2021

On-going consultation on the review of the Ordinance to the Federal Act on Data Protection

20 August 2021

New article “The Swiss response to the concerning issue of counterfeiting”